Jump to content

WM6.5, 23103 + 21634 (+21893 BETA) Lite Roms - HIDE21


Recommended Posts

Posted
This 28014 build is battery hungry. Anyone noticed that?

Might just need time to settle? Running the std Titanium version here and battery life is fine.

Guest chandanbs
Posted

wondering if our Dear Nick is gonna unleash his last yet rom of 2009.. ;) on 23619 build...??

B) just a thought.. which would be our biggest wish... :)

Guest WAIKIKI728
Posted
wondering if our Dear Nick is gonna unleash his last yet rom of 2009.. B) on 23619 build...??

:o just a thought.. which would be our biggest wish... :)

Be patient ...let him rest..... :(

Happy new year Nick ;) B)

Guest Maxwell Newton
Posted
Be patient ...let him rest..... B)

Happy new year Nick :) ;)

whats the difference between 23619 and 28014?

Thanks B)

Guest ...angel...
Posted

Guys please check the normal, m2d and lite links and mirrors of 28014....

This file has been deleted due to copyright violations
Guest HAKAN KAHRAMAN
Posted

Links dead please check for ultraLite 28014

Guest sanyoka123
Posted (edited)
Thanks.. but sir how about the classic or neo version?... Those are the ones that I want to download..X_X

28014 M2D :)

look first side.

28014 - Neo - M2D - Classic - Ultralite

Edited by sanyoka123
Guest ioannisioannis
Posted
And me!!!!!! :o :( :D

:) ;) me too B) B)

Guest hasnainhyder1
Posted
:) ;) me too B) B)

Me Three :D :o :( :D

Guest WAIKIKI728
Posted
Me Three :D B) :o :D

:) ;) B) ...take your time Nick..don´t be in hurry...your fans are waiting :(

Guest hasnainhyder1
Posted (edited)
+1 :) ;) B)

+(Infinity)^1000*Infinity+sqrt(Infinity)*sin(theta)/cos(2*theta) B) :o :(

Edited by hasnainhyder1
Guest amir_rafie
Posted (edited)

wmpoweruser said 28205 doesn`t have any change in comparison with 28014 , even 28014 is faster !<br /><br />Read what they said:<br /> Generally, nothing has changed since 28014, though it seems Internet Explorer is slightly more snappy. There are some downsides, such as massive memory usage and slow loading.<br /><br />i think we should wait for another build.

http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11808

Edited by amir_rafie
Guest Nicklashidegard
Posted

Happy new year to everyone!!

I'm back from a LOOONG break and ready to go again :) . Just testing 28205 and it seem to be running well but i've got a few issues to sort out (not build related) so i'll hopefully have a fresh rom ready in a few days. I'm thinking of not doin any more lite builds (only FloTanium and FloTanium Lite), it's very time consuming to do 5+ different builds and there are a lot of excellent new chefs about that do the Lite rom (prolly beter ;) )...

Guest demon-knight
Posted
Happy new year to everyone!!

I'm back from a LOOONG break and ready to go again :) . Just testing 28205 and it seem to be running well but i've got a few issues to sort out (not build related) so i'll hopefully have a fresh rom ready in a few days. I'm thinking of not doin any more lite builds (only FloTanium and FloTanium Lite), it's very time consuming to do 5+ different builds and there are a lot of excellent new chefs about that do the Lite rom (prolly beter ;) )...

How is memory usage as it has been reported that there is a memory problem with this version?

Guest Nicklashidegard
Posted
How is memory usage as it has been reported that there is a memory problem with this version?

So far so good.. but time will tell :)

Guest ...angel...
Posted
So far so good.. but time will tell :)

Nick can you include in your ROM the isaac mizrahi purple theme?... because I can't make it work using the cab from the windows mobile 6.5 goodies thread...the icons at the bottom of the screen doesn't look good X_X no circles.. just the text...;)

Guest Nicklashidegard
Posted
Nick can you include in your ROM the isaac mizrahi purple theme?... because I can't make it work using the cab from the windows mobile 6.5 goodies thread...the icons at the bottom of the screen doesn't look good X_X no circles.. just the text... ;)

Try this one :) (might not work, let me know)

isaac_mizrahi_purple_theme__28205_.cab

Guest jms2367
Posted
wmpoweruser said 28205 doesn`t have any change in comparison with 28014 , even 28014 is faster !<br /><br />Read what they said:<br /> Generally, nothing has changed since 28014, though it seems Internet Explorer is slightly more snappy. There are some downsides, such as massive memory usage and slow loading.<br /><br />i think we should wait for another build.

http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11808

i tried steff's 28205 rom yesterday. it's a nice rom and seems fast enough after testing it for a couple of hours. but i went back to nicklas' 28014's classic rom since i like the stuff cooked in with the rom. so far i don;t find ant issues with this rom. excellent work nick!

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.