Guest teknologist Posted December 28, 2009 Report Posted December 28, 2009 I don't understand why people say 1.91 is slower than 1.9 as it is the same kernel.... Maybe some app is killing your CPUs... Also as I am on Xmas holidays my phone has been switching from HSDPA to EDGE and I do feel the phone is a bit sluggish (nothing unbearable though!) when in EDGE...and that might have something to do with google sync over EDGE killing the CPU for an extended period compared to HSDPA...just a thought here... Anyway, if you guys think 1.91 is slower than 1.9 you could try decreasing ramzswap disksize_kb to the more conservative 80MB used in previous TCKs...Even though on my side, with the amount of apps I run on my phone, 128MB is a great setup...it might not be for everyone... Last but not least, considering the amount of people using TCK 1.91, I just wish to say that the few people complaining about sluggish phone are still a very small minority...even if it sounds the opposite by reading forums...
Guest liorry Posted December 28, 2009 Report Posted December 28, 2009 I don't understand why people say 1.91 is slower than 1.9 as it is the same kernel.... Maybe some app is killing your CPUs... Also as I am on Xmas holidays my phone has been switching from HSDPA to EDGE and I do feel the phone is a bit sluggish (nothing unbearable though!) when in EDGE...and that might have something to do with google sync over EDGE killing the CPU for an extended period compared to HSDPA...just a thought here... Anyway, if you guys think 1.91 is slower than 1.9 you could try decreasing ramzswap disksize_kb to the more conservative 80MB used in previous TCKs...Even though on my side, with the amount of apps I run on my phone, 128MB is a great setup...it might not be for everyone... Last but not least, considering the amount of people using TCK 1.91, I just wish to say that the few people complaining about sluggish phone are still a very small minority...even if it sounds the opposite by reading forums... I use TCK 1.91 and it's great... Thank you :)
Guest stevenz Posted December 28, 2009 Report Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) I'd be extremely surprised if HTC release any 2.x based ROMs for any of their phones before the Nexus One is released, doing so will encourage those few who "desperately need" 2.x to buy a Nexus rather than wait for the upgrade on their Hero. Even if that's not the plan, I'm sure they'd like the new phone to be even further up the "new-hotness" chart for a while. Google is probably throwing a lot of money their way. I've had no problems with any HTC widgets (original or the new mostly-useless downloadable ones) on any of the MCR builds I've used. I have noticed the phone getting _very_ sluggish, but I couldn't say for sure if it's gotten any better/worse over the last couple of MCR/Tek revisions. It'll be interesting to see how much (if at all) the 2.x ROM (kernel in particular) from HTC is optimised in comparison with the 1.5 one - if Tek's kernel is anything to go buy they could certainly stand to improve things even without any Apps2SD/CompCache/RamZswap etc. support. Edited December 28, 2009 by stevenz
Guest Dan Mullen Posted December 28, 2009 Report Posted December 28, 2009 I'd be extremely surprised if HTC release any 2.x based ROMs for any of their phones before the Nexus One is released, doing so will encourage those few who "desperately need" 2.x to buy a Nexus rather than wait for the upgrade on their Hero. Even if that's not the plan, I'm sure they'd like the new phone to be even further up the "new-hotness" chart for a while. Google is probably throwing a lot of money their way. I've had no problems with any HTC widgets (original or the new mostly-useless downloadable ones) on any of the MCR builds I've used. I have noticed the phone getting _very_ sluggish, but I couldn't say for sure if it's gotten any better/worse over the last couple of MCR/Tek revisions. It'll be interesting to see how much (if at all) the 2.x ROM (kernel in particular) from HTC is optimised in comparison with the 1.5 one - if Tek's kernel is anything to go buy they could certainly stand to improve things even without any Apps2SD/CompCache/RamZswap etc. support. Haven't HTC already intimated that we'll see 2.1 sometime in January?
Guest stevenz Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 Haven't HTC already intimated that we'll see 2.1 sometime in January? I don't believe they've said anything more specific than "early next year" in relation to the Sprint model (Sprint themselves have said 1st Quarter, or 1st Half, or something equally vague). I don't know that they've said anything specific for the GSM version other than "we're working on it", but it stands to reason that the 2 units being as similar as they are, 2.x for GSM would probably turn up at a similar time to the CDMA unless they're obligated differently. Feel free to show otherwise if I've missed something though.
Guest Shaon Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 i am sure that 2.1 update for gsm hero wont come before release of nexus one. because there will be a lot of people who will buy nexus one to get official 2.1. so after that craze is finished then they will release 2.1 for other old phones. last time in October when i said that 2.1 wont come out in 3-4 months many started screaming at me that htc is superb and they will give them 2.1 as Christmas gift. but u have to understand that above everything htc is a business company and their top most priority is profit not providing us software updates.
Guest Dan Mullen Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 i am sure that 2.1 update for gsm hero wont come before release of nexus one. because there will be a lot of people who will buy nexus one to get official 2.1. so after that craze is finished then they will release 2.1 for other old phones. last time in October when i said that 2.1 wont come out in 3-4 months many started screaming at me that htc is superb and they will give them 2.1 as Christmas gift. but u have to understand that above everything htc is a business company and their top most priority is profit not providing us software updates. I'll go on record and say that I'll be AMAZED if HTC don't release a 2.1 upgrade for the Hero before the Nexus One is available. There are other players in the market - it could take months before the Nexus One becomes available. In the meantime, people will look to buy other manufacturers' handsets that do offer Android 2. HTC won't needlessly hold off on this upgrade.
Guest Naruc Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 Awsome Paul, cant wait to see the changes in the comming version
Guest comeflywithme Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 (edited) Is chinese input finally available after missing for 2 version? Edited December 31, 2009 by comeflywithme
Guest Martyn.28 Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 I don't understand why people say 1.91 is slower than 1.9 as it is the same kernel.... Maybe some app is killing your CPUs... Also as I am on Xmas holidays my phone has been switching from HSDPA to EDGE and I do feel the phone is a bit sluggish (nothing unbearable though!) when in EDGE...and that might have something to do with google sync over EDGE killing the CPU for an extended period compared to HSDPA...just a thought here... Anyway, if you guys think 1.91 is slower than 1.9 you could try decreasing ramzswap disksize_kb to the more conservative 80MB used in previous TCKs...Even though on my side, with the amount of apps I run on my phone, 128MB is a great setup...it might not be for everyone... Last but not least, considering the amount of people using TCK 1.91, I just wish to say that the few people complaining about sluggish phone are still a very small minority...even if it sounds the opposite by reading forums... Hello and all the best in 2010 :) just a quick note to say in using latest 1.91 and no issues here. Looking forward to new MCR Paul and hey nice car (from pics on your profile) Take care all , dont get 2 drunk ;)
Guest keyra74 Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 seen on teknologist twitter : Waiting for Hero MCR 3.1? I'm going to use a new custom optimisation system for the build, hence the delay. It'll be worth!
Guest venturerider Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 seen on teknologist twitter : Waiting for Hero MCR 3.1? I'm going to use a new custom optimisation system for the build, hence the delay. It'll be worth! ODEX files, perhaps?
Guest encrypt Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 I'm new to the android scene. A quick question: I'm now using MCR 3.0... is it possible when 3.1 is out to upgrade without loose any apps/data or is a wipe needed?
Guest padstar Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 I'm new to the android scene. A quick question: I'm now using MCR 3.0... is it possible when 3.1 is out to upgrade without loose any apps/data or is a wipe needed? You shouldn't need to wipe between MCR 3.0 and 3.1. Just copy to your sd card and flash via recovery the usual way.
Guest encrypt Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 You shouldn't need to wipe between MCR 3.0 and 3.1. Just copy to your sd card and flash via recovery the usual way. And i'm not going to lose any apps/configurations?
Guest miragebg Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 And i'm not going to lose any apps/configurations? Nope.
Guest uk786 Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 And i'm not going to lose any apps/configurations? Nope you won't lose anything, but it would be a good idea to do a nandroid back-up.
Guest Pitel Posted January 2, 2010 Report Posted January 2, 2010 And i'm not going to lose any apps/configurations? If you don't wipe, you won't lose it.
Guest Iggy82 Posted January 4, 2010 Report Posted January 4, 2010 any news on this ? From Paul on his twitter thread today: Bah, spent most of the day tweaking the new MCR build method and it's still not quite there...! http://twitter.com/PaulOBrien
Guest blackcoffee85 Posted January 4, 2010 Report Posted January 4, 2010 I think there's a beta for ad-free/pro members of this forum, otherwise you'll be waiting a little longer :)
Guest Dan Mullen Posted January 4, 2010 Report Posted January 4, 2010 I think there's a beta for ad-free/pro members of this forum, otherwise you'll be waiting a little longer :) No, that's the T-Mobile Pulse ROM.
Guest uk786 Posted January 4, 2010 Report Posted January 4, 2010 From Paul on his twitter thread today: Bah, spent most of the day tweaking the new MCR build method and it's still not quite there...! http://twitter.com/PaulOBrien Paul is just great.
Guest keyra74 Posted January 5, 2010 Report Posted January 5, 2010 blah i should have checked twidroid :)
Guest e2zippo Posted January 5, 2010 Report Posted January 5, 2010 Any improvements on the noise level which is really high and annoying, maybe better audio quality if it's possible?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now