Guest BetterNot Posted January 9, 2010 Report Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) I've just made the switch to the i920 and I'm looking forward to the kitchen experience. I have to say the upgrade was well worth the money. It was a difficult decision between the O2 and the Droid but in the end, I opted for what I believe is the most open platform, thanks to these forums. Edited January 9, 2010 by BetterNot
Guest mamuco Posted January 9, 2010 Report Posted January 9, 2010 I've just made the switch to the i920 and I'm looking forward to the kitchen experience. I have to say the upgrade was well worth the money. It was a difficult decision between the O2 and the Droid but in the end, I opted for what I believe is the most open platform, thanks to these forums. cant say the same. went also from i910 to 920 and found the phone while much better then the 910 still lagging and unresponsive at times. Also that the screen didn't rotate by default and other annoyances let me look at teh droid. and i am very happy with that phone now.
Guest mdkpnj Posted January 9, 2010 Report Posted January 9, 2010 I also just upgraded to the O2 and couldn't be happier. It is a great phone. Unbeleivable screen, great battery life. I find it very fast and responsive. I'm glad I decided to make the switch. The i910 was a good phone but ahead of its time. It took custom ROM's to make it finger touch friendly enough for that type of device. The O2 has the finger firendlyness of WM 6.5 plus the other benbifits of its screen, processor, etc. I'd highly recomend it.
Guest Steel Reign Posted January 9, 2010 Report Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) The 3 main things that made me choose the O2 over the droid were: the amoled screen, battery life, and the ps1 emulator. The amoled screen makes the battery life great, and the ps1 emulator makes it so I can play all the classic ps1 games obviously. The droid won't probably have a good working ps1 emulator for atleast a year and a half, and thats at least because the droids main language is java. Meanwhile the language of windows is mainly c++ so its much easier to port things. Edited January 9, 2010 by Steel Reign
Guest Matt174e Posted January 9, 2010 Report Posted January 9, 2010 Is the PS1 emulator even fun to play on it? There's no multi-touch so I can't see how it can be remotely enjoyable to try and control. I hope I'm wrong though!
Guest Steel Reign Posted January 13, 2010 Report Posted January 13, 2010 Is the PS1 emulator even fun to play on it? There's no multi-touch so I can't see how it can be remotely enjoyable to try and control. I hope I'm wrong though! It works pretty well, once you get used to it its awesome, you can set the buttons to hold. It really doesn't need multi touch, as once you get used to the tap a button then tap another button really fast (it keeps each button on for awhile and if you press another button really fast it keeps them both pressed down) its great.
Guest BetterNot Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 It works pretty well, once you get used to it its awesome, you can set the buttons to hold. It really doesn't need multi touch, as once you get used to the tap a button then tap another button really fast (it keeps each button on for awhile and if you press another button really fast it keeps them both pressed down) its great. hi, Which emulator are you using? I did a quick google and found a few options. Thanks
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now