Jump to content

[request for devs] OC kernel for eclair (1.100.05/1.100.15)


Recommended Posts

Guest vikings123
Posted
thanks again.

Here is the bat file I used.

========================

adb reboot bootloader

fastboot -i 0x0502 flash boot liquide-boot-998.img

fastboot -i 0x0502 reboot

No luck.

Always stopped at the booting screen -- acer logo with small androids.

Guest Nesli
Posted (edited)

Damn :D So it looks, that it works only on the Vachounay...Any idea what changes were made there?

Also using 1.100.15 with phhusson MOD...great rom and really dont want Vahouchay :lol:

EDIT: New ROM appers - [Rom] Acer Liquid-E Mod v1.5 [06/27/2010] - it´s using Vachounay framework, its also mod over 1.100.15? Any chance that OC kernel will be functional there?

Edited by Nesli
Guest vanahaim
Posted
If not a big problem, could you add a chance to 1.100.05 with Vacounay_1.0.1. ? Just for curiosity.

For me it works perfectly at 921MHz.

So.. Yes, There is the problem, Vacounay_1.0.1 works fine :lol:

Guest Nesli
Posted (edited)

Maybe :D than :lol:

Kernel for one mod of one rom...hmmm...:).. But, sollution must exist :D

Edited by Nesli
Guest vanahaim
Posted (edited)
Maybe :) than :lol:

But, sollution must exist :D

I hope :D

So, is there this possibility? And one more request: Is it possible to add 128Mhz clock speed?

Thank you for your time´n´work!

Edited by vanahaim
Guest Mr.r9
Posted

@csics5, your kernel & wifi files are working for me. I am using Vach 1.0.1.

Do we choose Nexus 1 in set cpu or what?

Can you undervolt the cpu?

Thank you for your work :lol:

Guest lenanea
Posted

hi all

how to instal the boot.img to OC pls ?

Guest Nesli
Posted

via fastboot

adb

fastboot -i 0x0502 flash boot boot.img

fastboot -i 0x0502 reboot

Guest HustlinDaily
Posted

So these images only work on Vachacouchany?

Guest ahsid
Posted

okay, so 880 and 998 kernels work like a charm on my phone (runnning Vachounay)

Guest vikings123
Posted
okay, so 880 and 998 kernels work like a charm on my phone (runnning Vachounay)

I had to dig out Vach's 1.01 ROM (by Malez Recovery) and got the OC boot image to run.

But within SetCPU, I found the clock speed is running at 384, not 883, or 920. Not to mention 998.

Anyone can confirm this for me?

Guest Nesli
Posted

CPU slows down freq. = idle - to save battery - you need heavy cpu load to see max. freq.

Guest csics5
Posted
I had to dig out Vach's 1.01 ROM (by Malez Recovery) and got the OC boot image to run.

But within SetCPU, I found the clock speed is running at 384, not 883, or 920. Not to mention 998.

Anyone can confirm this for me?

Nesli wrote down the truth. I have tested with benchmark programs. The results showed the performance boost.

About the framework para:

We need to dig it. I think there is a solution. I'll contact with vache.

Guest HustlinDaily
Posted
Nesli wrote down the truth. I have tested with benchmark programs. The results showed the performance boost.

About the framework para:

We need to dig it. I think there is a solution. I'll contact with vache.

YOU ARE THE MAN!

Guest alfarobl
Posted
Nesli wrote down the truth. I have tested with benchmark programs. The results showed the performance boost.

About the framework para:

We need to dig it. I think there is a solution. I'll contact with vache.

Thanks for support. Does this new kernel add support for netfilter? Can it be used to do WIFI tethering? that will make 2.1 really great... (only Flash support to be excellent):

http://code.google.com/p/android-wifi-tether/

http://es.androlib.com/android.application...nacle-Ajji.aspx

Guest Nesli
Posted (edited)

and watch with fountain :D :D :)

PS: First time, make an OC functional :lol:

Edited by Nesli
Guest vikings123
Posted
CPU slows down freq. = idle - to save battery - you need heavy cpu load to see max. freq.

I used CPUBenchmark to test, the same. :lol:

Guest csics5
Posted
I used CPUBenchmark to test, the same. :lol:

Didn't use SetCPU before? Didn't turn on the 768MHz restriction maybe?

Guest csics5
Posted (edited)

If anyone interested in overclocking game. :lol:

Vachounay 1.0.1 seems very OC friendly.

Here is two boot.img, both with netfilter support.

The CPU benchmark shows the growing of CPU power, the 3D performance doesn't affected notably.

I tested both in my device, works correctly. Please always do a nandroid backup before flash.

1036MHz, 1,25V http://www.4shared.com/file/L7jtLIRK/boot-...-netfilter.html

1075MHz, 1,25V http://www.4shared.com/file/i5LoSzAw/boot-...-netfilter.html

For wifi working with this kernels, the dhd.ko file here: http://www.4shared.com/file/nw755oLP/_2__dhd.html

Install:

adb remount

adb push dhd.ko /etc/wifi

Edited by csics5
Guest rafyvitto
Posted
If anyone interested on overclocking game. :lol:

Vachounay 1.0.1 seems very OC friendly.

Here is two boot.img, both with netfilter support.

The CPU benchmark shows the growing of CPU power, the 3D performance doesn't affected notably.

I tested both in my device, works correctly. Please always do a nandroid backup before flash.

1036MHz, 1,25V http://www.4shared.com/file/L7jtLIRK/boot-...-netfilter.html

1075MHz, 1,25V http://www.4shared.com/file/i5LoSzAw/boot-...-netfilter.html

For wifi working with this kernels, the dhd.ko file here: http://www.4shared.com/file/nw755oLP/_2__dhd.html

Install:

adb remount

adb push dhd.ko /etc/wifi

1075mhz kernel running perfectly on my device, thanks for the boot.img mate.

Guest adrenalynik
Posted

Hi, to all!! Fantastic work! Thanks you very much, I have only a question, is not possibile tohave a kernel 998 mhz at 1.3v?

Guest csics5
Posted (edited)
Hi, to all!! Fantastic work! Thanks you very much, I have only a question, is not possibile tohave a kernel 998 mhz at 1.3v?

Sure. Here is. I modified the touchscreen sensitivity settings also. Please don't forget the backup before flash.

http://www.4shared.com/file/oxTkB9hs/boot-998-1_3V.html

For wifi working with this kernels, the dhd.ko file here: http://www.4shared.com/file/nw755oLP/_2__dhd.html

Edited by csics5
Guest adrenalynik
Posted (edited)

Very thanks.. I go to test!!!!

edit: another question, where is the differences from your and this: 998MHz @ 1.3V + static voltage scaling + ramzswap + TS fix ?

Edited by adrenalynik

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.