Jump to content

Custom kernel for Éclair (LCR v1.7 and 1.6)


Recommended Posts

Guest phhusson
Posted
Cyanogen's kernel for Nexus One for 1113600 uses 1275 for voltage. Maybe we can try with it.

We can't do >1.25V ATM, I don't know why yet.

Guest pikaone
Posted
Ahh, if only someone make OC boot.img for 1.100.05.... :lol:

flash your 1.100.05 with lcr7 and flash again with a phh kernel :D

Guest alfarobl
Posted

On LCR 1.6 with 883Mhz speed battery life is even better than regular kernel. So great.

Only issue is the WIFI tethering... I can use USB but would love to be able to use wifi with netfilter. Seems WIFI scripts fail on Liquid.

Guest simoneser
Posted

Uhm, on my Liquid it seems that 998mhz is working

It wasn't working both on Donut and Froyo

Guest pikaone
Posted (edited)
Woot, after making 1.100.15 1190MHZ boot.img I flashed it, it passed the Acer logo, but after that some crazy bright symbols appeared on the screen :D

Back to 998 MHz :D

peter, 998 doesn't work for me, my battery is a 1350mAh, and yours ? i believe some people have 1500mAh, maybe the problem is here :lol:

Edited by pikaone
Guest simoneser
Posted

I have 1350mAh battery and it works for me.

It wasn't working both on Donut and Froyo

Guest umair9001
Posted (edited)
peter, 998 doesn't work for me, my battery is a 1350mAh, and yours ? i believe some people have 1500mAh, maybe the problem is here :lol:

its working with mine, even though my batter is 1350mAh..

1350mAh defines the amount of current it can store..1500mAh will just be able to store more current.

on donut i only tried 920Mhz, didn't try the 1 Ghz one..and still haven't touched froyo to test..want lil bit stability on it.. :D

Edited by umair9001
Guest Borkata
Posted
We can't do >1.25V ATM, I don't know why yet.

What I see is that in n1 kernel, setting level of vdd pass through regulator, but for us it is set directly.

Guest Piter1225
Posted
peter, 998 doesn't work for me, my battery is a 1350mAh, and yours ? i believe some people have 1500mAh, maybe the problem is here :lol:

I heared that some Liquid's have problems with >920 MHz

Mine runs just great, speed is so sexy...

Some details about my Liquid:

- Batt: 1350 mAh

- Part No: XP H480Q.001

- Manufacturing date: Dec 2009

Guest bbpoux
Posted
I heared that some Liquid's have problems with >920 MHz

Mine runs just great, speed is so sexy...

Some details about my Liquid:

Hi,

Mine works great with 1 Ghz and LCR 1.7

Before on Donut i can't put the 1 Ghz kernel, only the 920 Mhz (Probably because of the voltage which is highter on the eclair 1 Ghz kernel than on the donut 1 Ghz Kernel)

Phh, Great Thanks for your job.

Guest gengaro86
Posted

I've got Wifi Tethering.

It was a hard night, I've recompiled dnsmasq and iwconfig for Android and I've created some scripts. Still doing lot of work to have MAC filtering (via config file) and.. learning how to build an update.zip, since I have to push some files into your sexy Liquids :lol:

Hope to release something within thursday and friday.

Guest umair9001
Posted

what should be the settings on setcpu with 998mhz?

i have chosen nexus profile to give 998, wht now??

sory for the dumb question, but neva played with the setcpu.. :lol:

Guest Piter1225
Posted
what should be the settings on setcpu with 998mhz?

i have chosen nexus profile to give 998, wht now??

sory for the dumb question, but neva played with the setcpu.. :lol:

SetCpu is useful only when you want to underclock, or enable some profiles (like different speed when charging, etc)

It is not needed to proper work OC'ed kernel

If you are running 998 you can select N1, and than configure the profiles, or advanced settings

Guest Charlton22
Posted

I'm interested to try the 1.2Ghz.. Could this cause any damage to my device?

Guest grease888
Posted

flash to 920, but reboot when start to use wifi...

any suggestion ?

Guest nameless'
Posted (edited)
I'm interested to try the 1.2Ghz.. Could this cause any damage to my device?

Off course it could

Edited by nameless'
Guest Charlton22
Posted
Off course it could

LOL ok I think I can live without it.....

Guest nameless'
Posted
LOL ok I think I can live without it.....

Not meaning it will, but it's a possible option :lol:

Guest liquid_it
Posted
I've got Wifi Tethering.

It was a hard night, I've recompiled dnsmasq and iwconfig for Android and I've created some scripts. Still doing lot of work to have MAC filtering (via config file) and.. learning how to build an update.zip, since I have to push some files into your sexy Liquids :lol:

Hope to release something within thursday and friday.

Great job, man!

Still I didn't get why it does not work out of the box while tun module is present.. Can you explain it?

Guest Mr.r9
Posted

Phhusson, did you try to undervolt the cpu? If you want a tester i'll be happy to help.

Posted
Phhusson, did you try to undervolt the cpu? If you want a tester i'll be happy to help.

That would be great (or maybe the 1Ghz version with the regular Voltage - like on the 1.6 kernel).

Guest grease888
Posted

which setcpu version you guys using ?

I use the latest version, but there is no such setcpu.txt.

any idea ?

Guest phhusson
Posted (edited)
That would be great (or maybe the 1Ghz version with the regular Voltage - like on the 1.6 kernel).

1GHz version is not overvoltaged.

And testing undervoltage properly would be a total pain

Edited by phhusson
Guest gengaro86
Posted
Great job, man!

Still I didn't get why it does not work out of the box while tun module is present.. Can you explain it?

I don't know :D

wpa_supplicant creates some unix domain sockets in /data/misc/wifi/sockets, for some reasons if the socket already exists (common after a reboot) then Barnacle just works, if the socket doesn't exist, barnacle doesn't even try to create a wpa_supplicant istance and just fails.

Tried almost everything (creating a unix socket, blank file, symlinking to other dirs) but it just doesn't want to work.

So, I preferred for a DIY solution, compiled iwconfig (which I don't use anymore) and dnsmasq and done some scripts.

Still testing, I'd like to provide a minimal GUI too, that's the main reason I'd release it later this week. :lol:

Guest liquid_it
Posted
Still testing, I'd like to provide a minimal GUI too, that's the main reason I'd release it later this week. :lol:

No hurry at all.. Good to know it works.. BTW I'm trying to find out why Vpn Connection (Cisco IPSEC client for android) does not work.. there're always some bugs to find.. :D

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.