Guest Sebastian404 Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 To be honest it would be quicker and easier if we just try and build a working 2.6.32.9 kernel for the blade, possibly using an existing kernel from the Legend as a base. I have another reason for asking the question.
Guest Sebastian404 Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 OK! I will ask him to do it tonight. :) Thanks a lot
Guest tmobilepulse Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 Thanks a lot a question. after the command, what result should i tell you?
Guest BigBearMDC Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 I think that his blade does not have a procfs, even though this shouldn't be possible :) cd / and ls returns 'DEV' and 'ROOT' only, where ROOT is just a symlink to /. cat /proc/mtd returns the partition table and mount points. Best regards, BB
Guest vl4d1m1r Posted October 4, 2010 Report Posted October 4, 2010 To be honest it would be quicker and easier if we just try and build a working 2.6.32.9 kernel for the blade, possibly using an existing kernel from the Legend as a base. Would be a fair amount of work but should be entirely possible to port given the released source code.
Guest badfly Posted October 5, 2010 Report Posted October 5, 2010 I think that his blade does not have a procfs, even though this shouldn't be possible :) cd / and ls returns 'DEV' and 'ROOT' only, where ROOT is just a symlink to /. cat /proc/mtd returns the partition table and mount points. Best regards, BB ZTE-V880 # cat /proc/mtd dev: size erasesize name mtd0: 00500000 00020000 "recovery" mtd1: 00500000 00020000 "boot" mtd2: 00180000 00020000 "splash" mtd3: 00080000 00020000 "misc" mtd4: 02580000 00020000 "cache" mtd5: 0dc00000 00020000 "system" mtd6: 0a280000 00020000 "userdata" mtd7: 01500000 00020000 "oem"
Guest fradleyp Posted October 5, 2010 Report Posted October 5, 2010 that's it. well done badfly! is there hope?
Guest lonegunman Posted October 5, 2010 Report Posted October 5, 2010 I think so, that shows if i am right the software layout for the phone\rom now how close does that match up with the san fran's layout....or am i talking out of my backside here..................
Guest Sebastian404 Posted October 5, 2010 Report Posted October 5, 2010 ZTE-V880 # cat /proc/mtd dev: size erasesize name mtd0: 00500000 00020000 "recovery" mtd1: 00500000 00020000 "boot" .... Thanks a lot BadFly,, that's very usefull
Guest Simon O Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 no update on this??? Since it's for a different phone we can't use it.
Guest fradleyp Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 I got excited when I saw this at the top, what a let down
Guest oh!dougal Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 Since it's for a different phone we can't use it. However, it indicates that ZTE are working on 2.2 for a VERY similar phone, and thus, if they cared to, at some future time ZTE could easily release a 2.2 that would run on the version of the Blade that we call San Francisco ... Or am I being an optimistic fool? The pessimist in me says that 2.2 might let them get away with installing less RAM than we have, and their interest would therefore be about production economies, rather than upgrading ...
Guest Bobby Demos Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 However, it indicates that ZTE are working on 2.2 for a VERY similar phone, and thus, if they cared to, at some future time ZTE could easily release a 2.2 that would run on the version of the Blade that we call San Francisco ... Or am I being an optimistic fool? The pessimist in me says that 2.2 might let them get away with installing less RAM than we have, and their interest would therefore be about production economies, rather than upgrading ... Word has it Orange is working on their own 2.2 for the San Fran? Bobby
Guest jsplace Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 Word has it Orange is working on their own 2.2 for the San Fran? Bobby Where did you hear this?
Guest tonycornholio Posted October 10, 2010 Report Posted October 10, 2010 Haha, the rumour mongering has started - stop it now, he said not to quote him on it! :)
Guest Bobby Demos Posted October 11, 2010 Report Posted October 11, 2010 Haha, the rumour mongering has started - stop it now, he said not to quote him on it! :) I spoke to my friend in the technical support team, he said that he isn't supposed to say, but Orange are working on a Froyo update for the San Francisco. Bobby
Guest oscheng Posted October 11, 2010 Report Posted October 11, 2010 I spoke to my friend in the technical support team, he said that he isn't supposed to say, but Orange are working on a Froyo update for the San Francisco. Bobby If he's in the call centre then I don't believe that he would know. If he's further up, maybe. But either way it would be ZTE doing the development, Orange's involvement would surely be to help localise and ******ise it.
Guest godmd5 Posted November 30, 2010 Report Posted November 30, 2010 ZTE-V880 # cat /proc/mtd dev: size erasesize name mtd0: 00500000 00020000 "recovery" mtd1: 00500000 00020000 "boot" mtd2: 00180000 00020000 "splash" mtd3: 00080000 00020000 "misc" mtd4: 02580000 00020000 "cache" mtd5: 0dc00000 00020000 "system" mtd6: 0a280000 00020000 "userdata" mtd7: 01500000 00020000 "oem" where is baseband (csc)data?
Guest ollie31770 Posted December 16, 2010 Report Posted December 16, 2010 Could someone please help me? I want to sync the facebook app, but this does not work on settings. It just goes back to the accounts and sync screen when I click on facebook. I really want the contacts from facebook on my phone. Thanks
Guest tiggerlator Posted December 16, 2010 Report Posted December 16, 2010 Try posting your question in the main section as a new thread.
Guest leehang Posted May 18, 2012 Report Posted May 18, 2012 chinese blade is gen2,you want 2.2rom? you can visit this web :http://bbs.hiapk.com/forum-344-1.html
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now