Guest nicksoph Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 980 - flb-froyo-blade-r3a-zte
Guest no-ice Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 (edited) ZTE Blade/San Francisco Unofficial Froyo Build, Alpha 1 Edited November 27, 2010 by no-ice
Guest Andoidian Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 Can I just quickly ask - do the higher scores for Froyo mean that the phone is working harder, or the upgraded ROMs are just more efficient? Of course I know overclocking makes the phone work harder.
Guest rayraven Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 No the phone isnt any harder, per se, the JIT added as part of froyo by Google makes it about 2x-5x faster.
Guest Kr0nos Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 do you feel any performance increase with froyo? i ask because i had a HTC Magic before (with 2.2 CM6) and now the Blade with 2.1 r4 and the Quadrant Score is nearly identical to lower, but the phone feels 10 times faster. So for me Quadrant seems pretty far away from reality
Guest rayraven Posted November 27, 2010 Report Posted November 27, 2010 Well, i dont feel the the same increase in snappiness as shown in Quadrant [it's almost 3x improvement there] But, yes, overall the phone is much more snappier. One simple thing is the gallery, i have about 200 photos on my sd card, and the gallery on opening would take quite a few seconds to start up on 2.1 With 2.2, it's always instant. With launcherpro as the default home, it's as snappy and smooth as android can be, if you ask me.
Guest dansken86 Posted November 29, 2010 Report Posted November 29, 2010 Why on earth do I only get around 440 on Quadrant, I'm also on fbl froyo 3 (lite, zte dialer)?? Same neocore though.. Could there be a particular modification or setting that may cause this huge difference for me? Guess I'll reflash and try again.
Guest Rem1x Posted November 29, 2010 Report Posted November 29, 2010 do you feel any performance increase with froyo? i ask because i had a HTC Magic before (with 2.2 CM6) and now the Blade with 2.1 r4 and the Quadrant Score is nearly identical to lower, but the phone feels 10 times faster. So for me Quadrant seems pretty far away from reality It feels a LOT faster :P
Guest dansken86 Posted November 29, 2010 Report Posted November 29, 2010 Ok problem solved, it was because I had done the YouTube hq fix (disabling stagefright player). Now reverted and scores 980!! Wierd though, no noticable difference I have to say.
Guest Rower85 Posted November 29, 2010 Report Posted November 29, 2010 (edited) I have the utube fix and FLB 2.2 r2 (beta) Score: 988 Would love to see anyone overclock this mf'er Edited November 29, 2010 by Rower85
Guest Sandy mk1 Posted December 9, 2010 Report Posted December 9, 2010 I'm running Froyo Alpha 3 Neocore = 36.3FPS Quadrant = 930 Froyo Alpha 3 is very snappy I've found
Guest Simon O Posted December 9, 2010 Report Posted December 9, 2010 I'm running Froyo Alpha 3 Neocore = 36.3FPS Quadrant = 930 Froyo Alpha 3 is very snappy I've found It's very good. Room for improvement but once it's out of alpha status it'll be fantastic!
Guest Frankish Posted December 9, 2010 Report Posted December 9, 2010 bloody good scores on quadrant for the spec of the phone, i get around 1695 on my Desire but thats overclocked. Without the OC i get around 1200-1250. Try running RCMixHD rom on your Desire with richardtrips overclock kernel. I used to get around 1900.
Guest lixcab Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 What do you guys use to check quadrant score? :(
Guest jurrasstoil Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 What do you guys use to check quadrant score? :( With the app "Quadrant Standard Edition"? ;)
Guest Phoenix Silver Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 quadrant app i have 985 not too bad
Guest dimerrr Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 (edited) What do you guys use to check quadrant score? :( Download quadrant app from market.I get 911 using paul's alpha 3 froyo rom edit :redone the test and got 976 ;) Edited December 26, 2010 by dimerrr
Guest NightSt@lk3r Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 I did 3 Quadrant runs on Paul's Froyo Alpha 3 883 918 956
Guest markusj Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 Finnish Fillyjonk RLS4 quadrant scores: default: 406 ahb overclocking: 428 ahb overclocking + hardware acceleration: 467 ahb+hw_ui w/ overclocking, CPU on 'performance' @672 MHz: 485 @691 MHz: 519 @710 MHz: 450 (WTF?)
Guest Buchtis Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 I'm getting shocking scores for both benches here, running 2.1 BladeVillan with no other apps in the background apart from appkiller. 406 on Quadrant 34.9 FPS on Neocore. Wtf.
Guest NightSt@lk3r Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 Quadrant scores on 2.1 seem to be about half that of scores on 2.2, is 2.2 really that much faster than 2.1?
Guest alanh5929 Posted December 27, 2010 Report Posted December 27, 2010 paul's alpha 4, h/w acc on, Quadrant: 1038 neocore 39.7 fps
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now