Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest ManMetDeHamer
Posted

Hmm so whats working and whats not yet working atm?

Guest wrtease
Posted (edited)

wrong place removed.

Edited by wrtease
Guest skywave
Posted

http://code.google.c...igh#makechanges

Same as alpha19 but with new kernel that fixes Multitouch.

Kernel source is at https://github.com/t...cs4blade_kernel

Thanks to rydberg and tom_g

http://code.google.com/p/ics4blade/downloads/detail?name=ics4blade-alpha19c.zip&can=1&q=&safe=high#makechanges

After a tip from t0mm13b who noticed a performance improvement using bustlam's in his 2.3.5 AOSP blade rom. So we forked burstlam and made some patches required for ics such as datamonitoring and the multitouch patches. Anyway the source of that is here: https://github.com/skywave/zte-blade-35 . The performance really improved, leading me to question if TomG actually uses his own kernel in CM9 ;) The kernel also is smaller, from 3.5 mb to 3.1 mb.

A mod of alpha19 is here http://code.google.com/p/ics4blade/downloads/detail?name=ics4blade-alpha19c.zip&can=2&q=

Guest BurgerZ
Posted

Hi. I'm trying to compile CM from sources.

My system is Gentoo Linux x64.

Java-vm is sun-jdk (6u29)

And while compiling I get this error:



Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/SoftKeyboard_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/VoiceRecognitionService_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Wiktionary_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/WiktionarySimple_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv1_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv1Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv2_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv2Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv3_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv3Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/PlatformLibraryClient_intermediates/emma_out/lib/classes-jarjar.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/UpgradeExample_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

target Non-prelinked: libquake (out/target/product/blade/symbols/system/lib/libquake.so)

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/ConnectivityManagerTest_intermediates/emma_out/lib/classes-jarjar.jar

target Jar: core-junitrunner (out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar)

target Package: EnabledTestApp (out/target/product/blade/obj/APPS/EnabledTestApp_intermediates/package.apk)

 'out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates//classes.dex' as 'classes.dex'...

 'out/target/common/obj/APPS/EnabledTestApp_intermediates//classes.dex' as 'classes.dex'...

java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: junit/runner/smalllogo.gif

        at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:175)

        at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:92)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.addFile(Main.java:713)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.update(Main.java:567)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.run(Main.java:202)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.main(Main.java:1149)

make: *** [out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar] Error 1

make: *** Deleting file `out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar'

make: *** Waiting for tasks to complete...

Thanks.

Guest hedgepigdaniel
Posted

Hi. I'm trying to compile CM from sources.

My system is Gentoo Linux x64.

Java-vm is sun-jdk (6u29)

And while compiling I get this error:



Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/SoftKeyboard_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/VoiceRecognitionService_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Wiktionary_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/WiktionarySimple_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv1_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv1Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv2_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv2Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv3_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/Notepadv3Solution_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/PlatformLibraryClient_intermediates/emma_out/lib/classes-jarjar.jar

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/UpgradeExample_intermediates/noproguard.classes.jar

target Non-prelinked: libquake (out/target/product/blade/symbols/system/lib/libquake.so)

Copying: out/target/common/obj/APPS/ConnectivityManagerTest_intermediates/emma_out/lib/classes-jarjar.jar

target Jar: core-junitrunner (out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar)

target Package: EnabledTestApp (out/target/product/blade/obj/APPS/EnabledTestApp_intermediates/package.apk)

 'out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates//classes.dex' as 'classes.dex'...

 'out/target/common/obj/APPS/EnabledTestApp_intermediates//classes.dex' as 'classes.dex'...

java.util.zip.ZipException: duplicate entry: junit/runner/smalllogo.gif

        at java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:175)

        at java.util.jar.JarOutputStream.putNextEntry(JarOutputStream.java:92)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.addFile(Main.java:713)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.update(Main.java:567)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.run(Main.java:202)

        at sun.tools.jar.Main.main(Main.java:1149)

make: *** [out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar] Error 1

make: *** Deleting file `out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/core-junitrunner_intermediates/javalib.jar'

make: *** Waiting for tasks to complete...

Thanks.

wrong thread, this thread is about ics4blade, not CM9.

Guest Amphoras
Posted

Hi. I'm trying to compile CM from sources.

My system is Gentoo Linux x64.

Java-vm is sun-jdk (6u29)

And while compiling I get this error:

Thanks.

If you're trying to build CM9, Tom G said last night that there were still a few more patches that needed to be submitted before it would build.

Guest davidnintendo
Posted

If you're trying to build CM9, Tom G said last night that there were still a few more patches that needed to be submitted before it would build.

What? Does that mean that TomG released the config files for the Blade? On his Github profile Blade files haven't been updated since february.

Guest mdani1
Posted

The update19c contain the USB Host Mode? At the moment, I'm not trying yet.

Guest hedgepigdaniel
Posted

What? Does that mean that TomG released the config files for the Blade? On his Github profile Blade files haven't been updated since february.

bump?

Guest BurgerZ
Posted (edited)

I have another question:

do i need to clean up after every build of the rom?

Like this:


make clean

rm -rf out/ device/zte/ kernel_zte_blade/

./repo forall -c "git reset --hard HEAD"

./repo forall -c "git clean -fdx"

./repo status

Edited by BurgerZ
Guest Amphoras
Posted

I have another question:

do i need to clean up after every build of the rom?

Like this:


make clean

rm -rf out/ device/zte/ kernel_zte_blade/

./repo forall -c "git reset --hard HEAD"

./repo forall -c "git clean -fdx"

./repo status

You shouldn't have to.

What? Does that mean that TomG released the config files for the Blade? On his Github profile Blade files haven't been updated since february.

That was one of the things that still needed adding.

Guest herpez
Posted (edited)

Wrong place, supposed to post in User and not Dev place.

Sorry

Edited by herpez
Guest BladeSimon
Posted (edited)

I tried the alpha21, but it didn't work very well. I could use it one minute but then I got a restart. Does anyone have any solution for this and what may cause it?

Edited by BladeSimon
Guest targetbsp
Posted (edited)

I tried the alpha21, but it didn't work very well. I could use it one minute but then I got a restart. Does anyone have any solution for this and what may cause it?

That sounds like what I had. I also had the same happen twice in burstlams RC4 version of CM9 alpha 5. I'm not sure what I was doing to cause it. Both started fine after install and I was setting stuff up, rebooting a few times as needed and all was well. Then at some point I'd reboot and they'd be had it. They'd reach the homesceen and just reboot a minute or so later. Over and over.

I hadn't actually done anything noticeable to kill this one. The boot before the one it died on I had installed the market gapps fix and restored Rom manager but then it booted up fine and was usable. Then I rebooted it cause market wasn't working (turned out market was down) and bam, it was wrecked. All I'd really done since my last successful boot was load up market and login to my google account.

[edit]

oops! I assumed we were in the users thread. sorry!

We should continue this here: http://android.modaco.com/topic/349555-ics-aosp-user-discussion/page__st__180 BladeSimon. :)

Edited by targetbsp
Guest senki1975
Posted

(sorry bad english)

No play incall ringtone, radio noise coming from the speaker. (alpha21)

Posted (edited)

It works fluidly, but I cannot activate WLAN. The button is always switching back to off . :(

Edited by borsus
Guest punkmilitia
Posted

Wow.

This has come on leaps and bounds!!

You can almost use it as a general ROM for day to day use.

Definitely the most advanced ICS ROM for Blade so far, hands down.

Good job!

Guest mitchde
Posted (edited)

"You can almost use it as a general ROM for day to day use.

Definitely the most advanced ICS ROM for Blade so far, hands down."

I think the goal / diff of CM9 4.0 builds and AOSP 4.0 is a bit different! So no one is better at all.

For daily use CM9 4.0 V5.2 is much more useable than alpha25 (i tested alpha25 today).

The second sentence of the commented lines is definily not true!! AOSP is not usable for daily usage compared to CM9 builds.

For my knowledge diff of AOSP to CM9 is that AOSP is more close +new code to Andriod 4.0 and CM9 more to get it working anyway.

Edited by mitchde
Guest skywave
Posted

"You can almost use it as a general ROM for day to day use.

Definitely the most advanced ICS ROM for Blade so far, hands down."

I think the goal / diff of CM9 4.0 builds and AOSP 4.0 is a bit different! So no one is better at all.

For daily use CM9 4.0 V5.2 is much more useable than alpha25 (i tested alpha25 today).

The second sentence of the commented lines is definily not true!! AOSP is not usable for daily usage compared to CM9 builds.

For my knowledge diff of AOSP to CM9 is that AOSP is more close +new code to Andriod 4.0 and CM9 more to get it working anyway.

At this point they are pretty much similar, though CM9 got a surfaceflinger that supports animation but is from a unknown source. Audio in ics4blade can be a little flakey but so can that the driver in CM9. Benefit of this is that the source is available so you can actually do s*** with it. Also this rom is much smaller as we dont have any CM bloat such as trebuchet (yuck), dsp managers and other stuff you may or may not need. Choice is good ;).

FYI from looking a the public repos it is currently impossible to build CM9 for armv6/our kernel devices at the moment, even if you got the ICS blade device tree. So to reply to that last comment, that just aint true ;)

Guest liamdunn
Posted

Might just be me and I may be wrong but I smelt CM fanboy

Posted

"You can almost use it as a general ROM for day to day use.

Definitely the most advanced ICS ROM for Blade so far, hands down."

I think the goal / diff of CM9 4.0 builds and AOSP 4.0 is a bit different! So no one is better at all.

For daily use CM9 4.0 V5.2 is much more useable than alpha25 (i tested alpha25 today).

The second sentence of the commented lines is definily not true!! AOSP is not usable for daily usage compared to CM9 builds.

For my knowledge diff of AOSP to CM9 is that AOSP is more close +new code to Andriod 4.0 and CM9 more to get it working anyway.

well Punkmilitia is just saying thanks and how he find ics aosp .. ! he as i see didnt asked ur opinion .

when anyone wants an opinion from anyone, they can ask and others can answer ;)

cheers

Posted

Might just be me and I may be wrong but I smelt CM fanboy

well maybe just you and maybe also me :P

anyway i am using also cm9 for now as i find it better but anyone can choose whatever he desire unless he asks what is better right :D.

And i wanna thank everyone working on ICS AOSP and CM9

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.