Guest mockingbird Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 I guess people still haven't understood that Antutu scores are bullsh*t and mean nothing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest commandline1984 Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Dregonfly didn't & it's faster than fastest Linux (Scientific Linux) with same version of GGC. Now considered that BSD is not that much optimized as Linux is & that the future of many core systems don't go that well with monolithic kernel that Thorvald is insisting on. Clang still lacks open MP support & GGC 9 is bringing a Open MP 2.0 support. Sorry, but i lol'd on the whole comment. SL is the fastest linux? And dragonfly is using a Semi monolithic Kernel. Try Minix if you want true Microkernel Capabilities. I'm out. Discussing wit you wont end well since you clearly not know what Linux was intended for and what BSD was intended for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ZolaIII Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 (edited) Sorry, but i lol'd on the whole comment. SL is the fastest linux? And dragonfly is using a Semi monolithic Kernel. Try Minix if you want true Microkernel Capabilities. I'm out. Discussing wit you wont end well since you clearly not know what Linux was intended for and what BSD was intended for.I don't discuss with ignorant people either! & when I clame something I do that based on facts! The basics about DragonFly structure including kernel!http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonFly_BSD You can find the last year's big comparatio of Linux distros & BSD at Phoronix & you can compare them with basic 6 tests of DragonFly 3.6.0 from same author on same system @ openbenchmarking.org Linux & BSD are UNIX like. The OS is intended to be used professionally far that he do best so for much better & faster handling of IO requests especially TCP ones BSD is usually used for web servers. On the other hand how much better it is you can see comparing iOS to Android when you involve graphics from this test:http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gfxbench-3-graphics-performance,3743-6.html So you tel me for what one OS is intended for? Edited February 28, 2014 by ZolaIII Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Taxxaz Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Interesting thing... My problem "the mic problem" it's gone just with uninstalling VIBER.. DAFUQ.. So for you folks round there delete dat VIBER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jairus1998 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I'm using V0.60 and the 'ondemandX' is awesome. Smooth and battery saving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gliwusss Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I'm using V0.60 and the 'ondemandX' is awesome. Smooth and battery saving what about deep sleep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SH3H1 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 what about deep sleep? Not sleeping when charging ;) Otherwise not bad :D I'm testing it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jairus1998 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Deep sleep works perfectly with my B199 stock rom (4.1.X) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StewieTech Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Oh yeah he´s back! :D v0.60 on 10.1 so far so good, no problem whatsoever. Thanks a lot OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest XXX-Man Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 On fusionX can't make it to run on 1046MHz...always resets to 1008... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jairus1998 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) On fusionX can't make it to run on 1046MHz...always resets to 1008... Overclock works perfectly on my Huawei ascend Y300-0100 Edited March 2, 2014 by Jairus1998 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ozeviktor92 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Overclock works perfectly on my Huawei ascend Y300-0100 But works without TricksterMod? I can't set 1046Mhz without this mod.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fonz93 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 But works without TricksterMod? I can't set 1046Mhz without this mod.... i tried on stock, cm10, cm10.1 and i could always set 1046 mhz with trickestermod... with the lock trick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ozeviktor92 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 i tried on stock, cm10, cm10.1 and i could always set 1046 mhz with trickestermod... with the lock trick I can set with lock trick the 1046Mhz but why can't set without it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jairus1998 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 I can set with lock trick the 1046Mhz but why can't set without it? Our phone is not meant to overclock. 1.0Ghz is already heating up like fries and expect to OC. Lucky there no 1.2GHz for y300 devices or the battery temp will be like global warming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Domino2115 Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 No ur wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ZolaIII Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 MP decision demon is reverting back the CPU parameters & that's the reason why you cannot set frequency's. I actually propose a cleanup of frequency table & new defaults 1046 max, 98 min & 1008 goes to retirement. Same for G510 (1243 max & 1206). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ceastel Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) Update to v0.61 (check changelog) @ZolaIII On y300 for two versions of devices I made universal underclock freq table. I don't have g510. Some g510 devices have 61Mhz and 122Mhz freq Others version have 65Mhz , 98Mhz and 122Mhz. I don't wanna give min freq as 98Mhz when some devices don't have it ... 320Mhz have all devices. You can always choose freq what you want and set in on boot. Edited March 2, 2014 by Ceastel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mockingbird Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 MP decision demon is reverting back the CPU parameters & that's the reason why you cannot set frequency's. I actually propose a cleanup of frequency table & new defaults 1046 max, 98 min & 1008 goes to retirement. Same for G510 (1243 max & 1206). I got no problems with the overclock as mp-decision is disabled by default. (CM10.1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ceastel Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) I uploaded kernel source on github : https://github.com/Ceastel/CeXstel-kernel-msm8x25 Who want can try compile it for CM11 or make with it what he want . ;D Greetings Edited March 2, 2014 by Ceastel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Victod Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) Max score ever achieved in Ascend Y300!. ^_^ Fusion X + CeXstel kernel v0.61 [+38 Mhz OC] @Ceastel Thanks mate! for ur great work in this kernel! ;) Edited March 2, 2014 by Victod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spanitzer Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Wow!Awesome for a Y300!I make a test with G510 and posted here.Sry for my Bad english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ZolaIII Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 @ Victod actually I achieved over 8k long time ago & record is around 8200. On a 0.59 I whose getting around 7900+. @ Ceastle I don't like this experiment with transforming deadline in inline IO. Where from did you got this settings from? I will do some testings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Victod Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 @ Victod actually I achieved over 8k long time ago & record is around 8200. On a 0.59 I whose getting around 7900+. Woa! :huh: How you did that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ZolaIII Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Woa! :huh: How you did that? By making it more real time per process bat real life performance did suffer. Making children process run first in SysCtl if you asked about 8000 score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now