Guest Ombla Posted January 20, 2015 Report Share Posted January 20, 2015 Mourta kernel 3.4 is not compatible with android 5.0.2 Lollipop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ottomanhero Posted January 20, 2015 Report Share Posted January 20, 2015 (edited) Mourta kernel 3.4 is not compatible with android 5.0.2 Lollipop? I'm not sure for this version but on euphoria OS you can get just any kernel to work (you get a black screen at first but a reboot fixes it) . Either way, I recommend that you use the kernel that comes with the ROM until a newer kernel is released as those kernels will be more bugfree (atleast in lollipop) as they were released together with the ROM.Even in euphoria, using another kernel causes weird mounting issues such as every picture in gallery having a duplicate with the same name etc. Edited January 20, 2015 by ottomanhero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ombla Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 So is, trying to put Mourtos 3.4 kernel on Cyanogenmod 12 and Euphoria and phone remained on boot image and had not gone. Thanks ottomanhero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mourta Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 So is, trying to put Mourtos 3.4 kernel on Cyanogenmod 12 and Euphoria and phone remained on boot image and had not gone. Thanks ottomanhero. Yeah, i wouldn't recommend it to be used on any ROM not compiled using at the very least four headers to compliment the code. Of course, if you do that it will ONLY work with 3.4. The truth is that the kernel doesn't really work right with anything at the moment, there are init files that need changing and i need to build a new ROM for it to work with properly. I suppose i could just build libstagefright with the new headers and include that in the kernel update but then i should probably build a backup of your current kernel and libstagefright to restore it if you want to return because you'd need to do that before using any 3.1 kernel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SuperLamic Posted February 24, 2015 Report Share Posted February 24, 2015 Yeah, i wouldn't recommend it to be used on any ROM not compiled using at the very least four headers to compliment the code. Of course, if you do that it will ONLY work with 3.4. The truth is that the kernel doesn't really work right with anything at the moment, there are init files that need changing and i need to build a new ROM for it to work with properly. I suppose i could just build libstagefright with the new headers and include that in the kernel update but then i should probably build a backup of your current kernel and libstagefright to restore it if you want to return because you'd need to do that before using any 3.1 kernel. Hi, thanks for your work, please can you tell me where are headers placed? I modded anykernel to rewrite init to yours, but it didn't boot either.. (I tried unofficial CM12). Is it even possible to rewrite it in already compiled rom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mourta Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Hi, thanks for your work, please can you tell me where are headers placed? I modded anykernel to rewrite init to yours, but it didn't boot either.. (I tried unofficial CM12). Is it even possible to rewrite it in already compiled rom? The headers are produced as the kernel is compiled, they are then used by the build process of the ROM to build certain parts that interact with kernel level drivers, it's nothing you can just add to your anykernel setup. The init files can be added to a boot.img at any time after compilation but my init files are not compatible with any ROM other than mine (and not really that one either, i haven't changed the init files to reflect relocations of things like smartdimmer or the RGB bridge. I'll do that when i compile a new ROM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tiflao Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Hello, the default kernel works fine? Some sugestions for more battery life? Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mourta Posted March 10, 2015 Report Share Posted March 10, 2015 Hello, the default kernel works fine? Some sugestions for more battery life? Regards This was abandoned for 3.4 kernel. A mod should probably close this thread with a redirect to the new thread. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ombla Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 It seems that those on the XDA will get it and have already released a version 5.0 liquidsmooth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gkeko Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 It seems that those on the XDA will get it and have already released a version 5.0 liquidsmooth... So what? Is there also a 3.4 kernel included? Probably not. Cmon can't you people just wait for few more days/weeks? greets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mourta Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 It seems that those on the XDA will get it and have already released a version 5.0 liquidsmooth... Yes, it's not hard to just compile it using old as crap code and leave it like that. My version will feature my 3.4/3.10 hybrid kernel and once it's out of testing it will be stable. If i didn't care i'd just release it as it was on first booting version but i care a bit more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now