Guest PalmTrees Posted September 24, 2017 Report Posted September 24, 2017 On 9/13/2017 at 5:45 PM, yener90 said: I uploaded the version 2017-09-13: https://mega.nz/#F!R0821JbT!3sv0sYWEsEhpZGH6WqNbXQ The difference here is that the device is default not rooted. If you want root, you need to install addonsu-13.0-x86-signed.zip. I will upload a zip file which replaces Home-Key with Back-key. All my thanks to Konstat, who helped me everytime. Thanks a lot for the update. Just flashed it :)
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 25, 2017 Report Posted September 25, 2017 @KonstaT Lenovo has released the Android N 7.1.1 update for the Yoga Book (Intel Atom x5-Z8550) earlier than planned. It's out now. I don't want to nag you, simply just ask if this is something you're going to look into with regards to the Vi10 Plus?
Guest fear_factory84 Posted September 25, 2017 Report Posted September 25, 2017 if there are no kernel sources and the sources of the various adaptations to the 7.1.1 aosp tree.. it's unlikely that Konsta will be able to port anything...
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 25, 2017 Report Posted September 25, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, fear_factory84 said: if there are no kernel sources and the sources of the various adaptations to the 7.1.1 aosp tree.. it's unlikely that Konsta will be able to port anything... Did I adress you? No. Did I talk about porting? No. I referenced this before, so he knows very well about this. Are "you're going to look into with regards to the Vi10 Plus?" was the question. I want to hear @KonstaT's thoughts on this and answers to this despite what it might be. Not yours, mind your own business. Edited September 25, 2017 by PalmTrees
Guest KonstaT Posted September 25, 2017 Report Posted September 25, 2017 10 hours ago, PalmTrees said: @KonstaT Lenovo has released the Android N 7.1.1 update for the Yoga Book (Intel Atom x5-Z8550) earlier than planned. It's out now. I don't want to nag you, simply just ask if this is something you're going to look into with regards to the Vi10 Plus? Is it available for download somewhere?
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 25, 2017 Report Posted September 25, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, KonstaT said: Is it available for download somewhere? Yes, I found it over at 4pda (yadi.sk link). https://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=798682&st=780#entry65379900 Boot.img is uploaded in the second post. Kernel version (3.14.79) is the same as Chuwi Vi10 Plus (can be seen in the screenshot here https://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=798682&st=780#entry65352949). All credits and thanks go to tank0412 (4pda/xda) for requesting the file and the uploader titoff1973 (4pda). Edited September 25, 2017 by PalmTrees Found the link and completely rewrote the post
Guest KonstaT Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 10 hours ago, PalmTrees said: Yes, I found it over at 4pda (yadi.sk link). https://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=798682&st=780#entry65379900 Boot.img is uploaded in the second post. Kernel version (3.14.79) is the same as Chuwi Vi10 Plus (can be seen in the screenshot here https://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=798682&st=780#entry65352949). All credits and thanks go to tank0412 (4pda/xda) for requesting the file and the uploader titoff1973 (4pda). Cool, I'll check it out when I get around.
Guest fear_factory84 Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 13 hours ago, PalmTrees said: Did I adress you? No. Did I talk about porting? No. I referenced this before, so he knows very well about this. Are "you're going to look into with regards to the Vi10 Plus?" was the question. I want to hear @KonstaT's thoughts on this and answers to this despite what it might be. Not yours, mind your own business. If this was the purpose you should have used a PM. Try to calm down. Have you eaten something heavy? Peppers at dinner?
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 2 hours ago, KonstaT said: Cool, I'll check it out when I get around. Great thanks :) 1 hour ago, fear_factory84 said: If this was the purpose you should have used a PM. Try to calm down. Have you eaten something heavy? Peppers at dinner? How about "Thanks for sharing this. Let's hope for Android N development for Chuwi tablets".
Guest fear_factory84 Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 Thanking you if you help to port nougat to these Chuwi tablets is perfectly fine and deserved, but this doesn't authorize you to bull people around.
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 1 hour ago, fear_factory84 said: Thanking you if you help to port nougat to these Chuwi tablets is perfectly fine and deserved, but this doesn't authorize you to bull people around. Let's hear the list of people I "bull around". Tell you what, quit your "bull" around here and focus on the real topic. Your rants are pointless and a waste of time, I provided the source, gave proper credit, been discussing this with KonstaT in different posts and know the community has great interest in Android N for the Atom series. Back on topic. Excited to hear what @KonstaTmakes of it, no matter if it's good or bad news.
Guest KonstaT Posted September 26, 2017 Report Posted September 26, 2017 (edited) Chill guys. No one is going to give you any ETAs. I'm busy with other things and I said I'll look into it when I get around. Anyone is free to pick this up and do whatever they want with it (there's other people working on Cherry Trail as well). That's the beauty of open source. :) There's at least few significant issues Nougat bring up is going to introduce. If we want to use binary display drivers from the Lenovo N release (like we have to unless we can somehow shim the M blobs = hacky) we need to switch to building x86_64 Android. Unlike e.g. Qualcomm with open source audio/display/media HALs, Intel BSP uses prebuilt display HALs (gralloc, hwcomposer) which causes all kinds of issues with next Android versions. Lenovo N has 64-bit binary blobs - we end up with a crazy match of 64-bit Android N drivers and device/hardware specific 32-bit Andoid L drivers with some shims (camera) in between (stock firmware on this device is 32-bit Android L). Realtek bluetooth is all blobs from Medion M release in M (open source in L). I'm not aware of any N Realtek bluetooth blobs. That is likely going to be a major issue as well. This device was meant to run Android 5.1 and CM12.1 is near perfect. Every next Android version has its repercussions (as you can see the list of issues in the OP) and you also need to consider when it's worth the effort (or are we just playing a round of 'will it run' :P). I just don't see the point in releasing something utterly broken. Edit. XDA recently had a piece about this proprietary blob hell we're dealing with. https://www.xda-developers.com/cameras-custom-roms-developers-make-hardware-work-without-source-code/ Edited September 27, 2017 by KonstaT
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 On 9/26/2017 at 7:23 PM, KonstaT said: This device was meant to run Android 5.1 and CM12.1 is near perfect. Every next Android version has its repercussions (as you can see the list of issues in the OP) and you also need to consider when it's worth the effort (or are we just playing a round of 'will it run' :P). I just don't see the point in releasing something utterly broken. I hope tank0412 gets his AOSP 7.1.1 x86_64 build to boot on the Mi Pad 2 :) Even with those issues at hand, "will it run" would be interesting to find out, though we're not likely to see a stable build. Whatever you want to do is totally up to you - you're the most experienced developer around these parts.
Guest KonstaT Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) 7 hours ago, PalmTrees said: I hope tank0412 gets his AOSP 7.1.1 x86_64 build to boot on the Mi Pad 2 :) Even with those issues at hand, "will it run" would be interesting to find out, though we're not likely to see a stable build. Whatever you want to do is totally up to you - you're the most experienced developer around these parts. Well, mine at least 'boots'. There's something seriously off with the display drivers, though. 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 E ufoGralloc: Driver() failed to open drm driver i915 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 I ufoGralloc: Hello, this is UFO GRALLOC/Intel Corporation 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 I ufoGralloc: ro.camera.rec.pixel_format = 0x10f (271) 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 I ufoGralloc: ro.ycbcr.pixel_format = 0x10f (271) 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 E ufoGralloc: perform() wrong module 0x7f6d7d2611e8 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 E grallocClient: FATAL: mismatched gralloc module: UFO GRALLOC/Intel Corporation, -19 09-29 13:27:47.371 2433 2433 W libEGL : eglInitialize(0x7f6d7e20c500) failed (EGL_NOT_INITIALIZED) 09-29 13:27:47.372 2433 2433 E ufoGralloc: open() wrong module 0x7f6d7d2611e8 09-29 13:27:47.372 2433 2433 W ufoGralloc: open() attempted with module UFO GRALLOC 09-29 13:27:47.439 2433 2433 E hwc : Persistent registry load failed to open file /cache/hwc.reg 09-29 13:27:47.440 2433 2433 E grallocClient: getFd() failed, -38/Function not implemented 09-29 13:27:47.440 2433 2433 F hwc : Unable to query shared Gralloc DRM handle --------- beginning of crash 09-29 13:27:47.440 2433 2433 F libc : Fatal signal 6 (SIGABRT), code -6 in tid 2433 (surfaceflinger) 09-29 13:27:47.441 2370 2370 W : debuggerd: handling request: pid=2433 uid=1000 gid=1003 tid=2433 09-29 13:27:47.445 2457 2457 E : debuggerd: Unable to connect to activity manager (connect failed: No such file or directory) 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : LineageOS Version: '14.1-20170928-UNOFFICIAL-KonstaKANG-chuwi_vi10plus' 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : Build fingerprint: 'intel/cht_cr_mrd_w/cht_cr_mrd_w:5.1/LMY47I/softteam08031045:userdebug/release-keys' 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : Revision: '0' 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : ABI: 'x86_64' 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : pid: 2433, tid: 2433, name: surfaceflinger >>> /system/bin/surfaceflinger <<< 09-29 13:27:47.497 2457 2457 F DEBUG : signal 6 (SIGABRT), code -6 (SI_TKILL), fault addr -------- 09-29 13:27:47.498 2457 2457 F DEBUG : Abort message: 'Unable to query shared Gralloc DRM handle' 09-29 13:27:47.498 2457 2457 F DEBUG : rax 0000000000000000 rbx 00007f6d7f51dbe8 rcx ffffffffffffffff rdx 0000000000000006 09-29 13:27:47.498 2457 2457 F DEBUG : rsi 0000000000000981 rdi 0000000000000981 09-29 13:27:47.499 2457 2457 F DEBUG : r8 0000000000000001 r9 0000000000002d4a r10 0000000000000008 r11 0000000000000206 09-29 13:27:47.499 2457 2457 F DEBUG : r12 0000000000000981 r13 0000000000000006 r14 00007f6d7ce1fb1c r15 00007f6d7ce460a8 09-29 13:27:47.499 2457 2457 F DEBUG : cs 0000000000000033 ss 000000000000002b 09-29 13:27:47.499 2457 2457 F DEBUG : rip 00007f6d7f088bf7 rbp 0000000000000000 rsp 00007ffedb27fc38 eflags 0000000000000206 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : backtrace: 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #00 pc 0000000000090bf7 /system/lib64/libc.so (tgkill+7) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #01 pc 000000000008d612 /system/lib64/libc.so (pthread_kill+66) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #02 pc 00000000000303f1 /system/lib64/libc.so (raise+17) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #03 pc 00000000000287de /system/lib64/libc.so (abort+78) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #04 pc 0000000000010e9f /system/lib64/libcutils.so (__android_log_assert+287) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #05 pc 000000000005c85c /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #06 pc 000000000006100c /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #07 pc 000000000005c769 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #08 pc 000000000005e7e3 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #09 pc 0000000000060ed9 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #10 pc 000000000005dea2 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #11 pc 0000000000027102 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #12 pc 00000000000195bf /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #13 pc 0000000000012426 /system/bin/linker64 (__dl__ZN6soinfo10call_arrayEPKcPPFvvEmb+390) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #14 pc 0000000000010233 /system/bin/linker64 (__dl__Z9do_dlopenPKciPK17android_dlextinfoPv+2755) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #15 pc 000000000000c37a /system/bin/linker64 (__dl_dlopen+42) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #16 pc 0000000000000bdc /system/lib64/libhardware.so (hw_get_module_by_class+604) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #17 pc 0000000000057155 /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #18 pc 0000000000056daa /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #19 pc 00000000000445d5 /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #20 pc 0000000000047188 /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so (_ZN7android14SurfaceFlinger4initEv+936) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #21 pc 000000000000130a /system/bin/surfaceflinger 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #22 pc 000000000001c9ec /system/lib64/libc.so (__libc_init+108) 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #23 pc 00000000000011c7 /system/bin/surfaceflinger 09-29 13:27:47.513 2457 2457 F DEBUG : #24 pc 0000000000000000 <unknown> 09-29 13:27:47.558 2370 2370 W : debuggerd: resuming target 2433 I first built x86_64 cm-13.0 with 64-bit display blobs from Teclast Tbook 16 Power Marshmallow (also tried blobs from Yoga Book Marshmallow) and it works fine what comes to display (there's other issues, though). No idea what's going on with cm-14.1 and N blobs... Edit. Got a bit further. Might be down to kernel driver now. 09-29 20:09:34.210 2435 2435 I ufoGralloc: Hello, this is UFO GRALLOC/Intel Corporation 09-29 20:09:34.210 2435 2435 I ufoGralloc: ro.camera.rec.pixel_format = 0x10f (271) 09-29 20:09:34.210 2435 2435 I ufoGralloc: ro.ycbcr.pixel_format = 0x10f (271) 09-29 20:09:34.279 2435 2435 E hwc : Persistent registry load failed to open file /cache/hwc.reg 09-29 20:09:34.280 2435 2435 I surfaceflinger: type=1400 audit(0.0:24): avc: denied { write } for name="i915_videostatus" dev="sysfs" ino=12999 scontext=u:r:surfaceflinger:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:sysfs:s0 tclass=file permissive=1 09-29 20:09:34.280 2435 2435 E hwc : Failed drmGetCap( 17 ), ret:0 09-29 20:09:34.280 2435 2435 I hwc : NOT AVAILABLE: DMR/KMS Render Compression support 09-29 20:09:34.284 2434 2434 E SELinux : avc: denied { add } for service=hwc.info pid=2435 uid=1000 scontext=u:r:surfaceflinger:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:default_android_service:s0 tclass=service_manager permissive=1 09-29 20:09:34.285 2435 2435 D hwc : DRM connector 29 Panel CONNECTED DynamicMode:0 SeamlessDRRS:0 PanelFitter:1 DPMS:1 09-29 20:09:34.285 2435 2435 D hwc : DRM connector 34 External DISCONNECTED DynamicMode:0 SeamlessDRRS:0 PanelFitter:1 DPMS:1 09-29 20:09:34.286 2435 2435 D hwc : DRM connector 38 External DISCONNECTED DynamicMode:0 SeamlessDRRS:0 PanelFitter:1 DPMS:1 09-29 20:09:34.286 2435 2435 D hwc : DisplayCaps creating caps for device 0x22b0 pipe 0 09-29 20:09:34.286 2435 2435 I hwc : DisplayCaps construct Baytrail class caps for display pipe 0 09-29 20:09:34.286 2435 2435 D hwc : Selected mode for Connector:29 [Connector 0x7fce21472180 Connected, CrtcID 6, PipeIdx 0] is Mode:0 1920x1280 60Hz Preferred 164.4MHz (2055x1334) 09-29 20:09:34.286 2435 2435 I libva : VA-API version 0.99.0 09-29 20:09:34.287 2435 2435 I libva : va_getDriverName() returns 0 09-29 20:09:34.287 2435 2435 I libva : Trying to open /vendor/lib64/i965_drv_video.so 09-29 20:09:34.325 2435 2435 I libva : Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_32 09-29 20:09:34.326 2435 2492 D ufo : Detected device 22B0:34 family 17:11 09-29 20:09:34.326 2435 2492 E ufoGralloc: failed to perform fallocate (0, 0, 9830400), -38/Function not implemented 09-29 20:09:34.326 2435 2492 E ufoGralloc: perform(33) failed, -38/Function not implemented 09-29 20:09:34.326 2435 2492 E grallocClient: fallocate(0x7fce21a372d0) failed, -38/Function not implemented 09-29 20:09:34.326 2435 2492 E hwc : Fallocate not implemented. Expect a higher memory footprint until its supported 09-29 20:09:34.332 2435 2492 D hwc : Testing Drm atomic API 09-29 20:09:34.334 2435 2435 I libva : va_openDriver() returns 0 09-29 20:09:34.350 2435 2492 D hwc : Drm atomic API is available 09-29 20:09:34.360 2435 2435 V IVP : iVP_create_context: Create Context success: ctx_id=0x70000000, vp_context=0x7fce21440240 09-29 20:09:34.360 2435 2435 D ufoEGL : droid_create_context : config id = 1 conf->NativeVisualID=1 09-29 20:09:34.360 2435 2435 I ufoEGL : Requested context : GLES 2.0 09-29 20:09:34.391 2435 2435 I : GL_VERSION: OpenGL ES 3.1 - Build 4.70.60868-R 09-29 20:09:34.391 2435 2435 I : GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.10 - Build 4.70.60868-R 09-29 20:09:34.487 2435 2435 D ufoEGL : Pixel Format : GGL_PIXEL_FORMAT_RGBA_8888 --------- beginning of crash 09-29 20:09:34.504 2435 2435 F libc : Fatal signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1, fault addr 0x8 in tid 2435 (surfaceflinger) 09-29 20:09:34.504 2370 2370 W : debuggerd: handling request: pid=2435 uid=1000 gid=1003 tid=2435 09-29 20:09:34.510 2520 2520 E : debuggerd: Unable to connect to activity manager (connect failed: No such file or directory) 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : LineageOS Version: '14.1-20170928-UNOFFICIAL-KonstaKANG-chuwi_vi10plus' 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : Build fingerprint: 'intel/cht_cr_mrd_w/cht_cr_mrd_w:5.1/LMY47I/softteam08031045:userdebug/release-keys' 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : Revision: '0' 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : ABI: 'x86_64' 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : pid: 2435, tid: 2435, name: surfaceflinger >>> /system/bin/surfaceflinger <<< 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : signal 11 (SIGSEGV), code 1 (SEGV_MAPERR), fault addr 0x8 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : rax 0000000000000000 rbx 00007fce1c7b2000 rcx 0000000000000010 rdx 0000000000000100 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : rsi 00007fce213f7740 rdi 0030306100007f00 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : r8 0000000000000010 r9 0000000000000000 r10 00007fce213f7740 r11 0000000000000000 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : r12 00007fce21a26980 r13 0000000000000001 r14 00007fce213f7740 r15 0000000000000001 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : cs 0000000000000033 ss 000000000000002b 09-29 20:09:34.513 2520 2520 F DEBUG : rip 00007fce20c7fbda rbp 00007fffb640a0e0 rsp 00007fffb640a070 eflags 0000000000010206 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : backtrace: 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #00 pc 00000000001c1bda /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #01 pc 0000000000385a75 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #02 pc 0000000000386631 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #03 pc 0000000000395a05 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #04 pc 000000000039d077 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #05 pc 00000000001771eb /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #06 pc 0000000000522c13 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #07 pc 000000000052387b /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #08 pc 0000000000520554 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #09 pc 00000000001441b9 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #10 pc 00000000000dedc4 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #11 pc 00000000000dfd6d /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #12 pc 00000000000e71e4 /system/vendor/lib64/egl/libGLES_intel8.so (eglMakeCurrent+740) 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #13 pc 0000000000012414 /system/lib64/libEGL.so (_ZN7android13egl_display_t11makeCurrentEPNS_13egl_context_tES2_PvS3_S3_S3_S3_S3_+260) 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #14 pc 0000000000015e30 /system/lib64/libEGL.so (eglMakeCurrent+432) 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #15 pc 0000000000055eeb /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #16 pc 000000000005637d /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #17 pc 00000000000564e2 /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #18 pc 000000000005cbcf /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #19 pc 000000000002ba1e /system/vendor/lib64/hw/hwcomposer.gmin.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #20 pc 000000000005719a /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #21 pc 0000000000056daa /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #22 pc 00000000000445d5 /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #23 pc 0000000000047188 /system/lib64/libsurfaceflinger.so (_ZN7android14SurfaceFlinger4initEv+936) 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #24 pc 000000000000130a /system/bin/surfaceflinger 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #25 pc 000000000001c9ec /system/lib64/libc.so (__libc_init+108) 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #26 pc 00000000000011c7 /system/bin/surfaceflinger 09-29 20:09:34.538 2520 2520 F DEBUG : #27 pc 0000000000000000 <unknown> 09-29 20:09:34.597 2370 2370 W : debuggerd: resuming target 2435 Edited September 29, 2017 by KonstaT
Guest PalmTrees Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 4 hours ago, KonstaT said: Well, mine at least 'boots'. There's something seriously off with the display drivers, though. I first built x86_64 cm-13.0 with 64-bit display blobs from Teclast Tbook 16 Power Marshmallow (also tried blobs from Yoga Book Marshmallow) and it works fine what comes to display (there's other issues, though). No idea what's going on with cm-14.1 and N blobs... I'm not surprised you got it to boot :D Didn't know the Tbook 16 Power was running Android 6 out-the-box, but good that you got the blobs from both devices working on cm-13.0. Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to suggest any fancy solutions to the cm-14.1/N blobs problem. Which annoys me, just got to keep studying :)
Guest Hi12Guy Posted October 10, 2017 Report Posted October 10, 2017 So any chance to get Nougat to our lovely Hi12 Tablet? <3 Konsta #1 :3
Guest Hi12Guy Posted October 11, 2017 Report Posted October 11, 2017 Hey Guys I succesful boot BLISS ROM 7.x Nougat X86 on The Chuwi Hi12 https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/x86-bliss-x86-pc-s-t3534657 -Boots fine -Display Works - Keyboard works -Sound works -Wifi works - TOUCH NOT WORKS I hope I can fix touch than poste update :)
Guest ViAlexSt Posted October 11, 2017 Report Posted October 11, 2017 10 hours ago, Hi12Guy said: I succesful boot BLISS ROM 7.x Nougat X86 on The Chuwi Hi12 Great news! Where can download your ROM? I have Chuwi HiBook Pro, will try to do the same...
Guest Hi12Guy Posted October 11, 2017 Report Posted October 11, 2017 7 hours ago, ViAlexSt said: Great news! Where can download your ROM? I have Chuwi HiBook Pro, will try to do the same... https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/x86-bliss-x86-pc-s-t3534657 Also the new Android X86 ISO boots fine... even more stable than bliss... Sound/Touch not working atm. Last Version I tried didn#t even boot. Now boots :)
Guest ViAlexSt Posted October 12, 2017 Report Posted October 12, 2017 This link is known to me. It seems that I was happy too early: I thought that the Rom made for installation in TWRP. As Phoenix for Tbook 10S.
Guest ViAlexSt Posted October 12, 2017 Report Posted October 12, 2017 13 hours ago, Hi12Guy said: Sound/Touch not working atm. Patches for Linux 4.12 which on Chuwi Hi12 works sound and touch: https://github.com/kernins/linux-chwhi12
Guest Hi12Guy Posted October 12, 2017 Report Posted October 12, 2017 21 hours ago, Hi12Guy said: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/x86-bliss-x86-pc-s-t3534657 Also the new Android X86 ISO boots fine... even more stable than bliss... Sound/Touch not working atm. Last Version I tried didn#t even boot. Now boots :) 7 hours ago, ViAlexSt said: Patches for Linux 4.12 which on Chuwi Hi12 works sound and touch: https://github.com/kernins/linux-chwhi12 Thanks for the share, do you know how to merge it?
Guest THEHOLYG0D Posted October 13, 2017 Report Posted October 13, 2017 I have a Hi10 Plus and I've already started syncing the Android-x86 Because it boots and there is issue only of touch, apart everything is stable. I found some various .fw files for touch support also I'll sync, but if someone would tell me how do I merge or build a kernel with these files, that'd be great.. 23 hours ago, ViAlexSt said: Patches for Linux 4.12 which on Chuwi Hi12 works sound and touch: https://github.com/kernins/linux-chwhi12
Guest KonstaT Posted October 13, 2017 Report Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) Please take your Android-x86 (and Remix OS/Phonix OS/Bliss ROM/etc based on that) discussion somewhere else (e.g. open a new thread or something). It has nothing to do with what we're trying to achieve here. Edited October 13, 2017 by KonstaT
Guest pawwaap Posted October 15, 2017 Report Posted October 15, 2017 On 13/09/2017 at 5:45 PM, yener90 said: I uploaded the version 2017-09-13: https://mega.nz/#F!R0821JbT!3sv0sYWEsEhpZGH6WqNbXQ The difference here is that the device is default not rooted. If you want root, you need to install addonsu-13.0-x86-signed.zip. And where to get addonsu-13.0-x86-signed.zip from?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now