[ICS] [4.0.4] CyanogenMod 9.1 [ROM]

[Guest Pirex69]

I´m still with infusion and i have 3196...

[Guest Ludak021]

got 3800+ with ordinary stock rom minus some apps + V6 supercharge + 1.24ghz oc. Got 3200ish with just stock rom, no fidling. Actualy, CM9 is giving bad scores in benchmarks but works fine in reality.

edit: I think we need YT working, and other video related stuff, to hell with benchmarks.

Edited November 21, 2012 by Ludak021

[Guest downloadvibe]

someone already tried to see the performance in games? I went back to gingerbread because of the performance to be superior ... someone please confirm that

[Guest downloadvibe]

got 3800+ with ordinary stock rom minus some apps + V6 supercharge + 1.24ghz oc. Got 3200ish with just stock rom, no fidling. Actualy, CM9 is giving bad scores in benchmarks but works fine in reality.

Forget the benchmarks... see the real performance.... this is the first rom with gpu hw on the ui...

[Guest Aurimas L.]

Now I've got wifi freeze everytime or 95% when I turn it on... :-/

[Guest fr0do]

Now I've got wifi freeze everytime or 95% when I turn it on... :-/

You do realise that this is a known issue. Memory allocation was increased to minimise the frequency considerably. If you want to prevent it happening, just make sure the phone isn't busy using lots of memory before you toggle wifi. If you've crapped out your phone so there's constantly lots running, then yeah, you're going to get freezes. The issue is completely resolved in r3. Edited November 21, 2012 by fr0do

[Guest wouterbeer]

You do realise that this is a known issue.

Then why is this not added (again) to the second post 'known issues'? Together with other bugs like lagging video playback and (for some) phone signal dropping? This would help get a nice overview of bugs that can be worked on / come with this CM9 release and then people do not have to read all 32 pages of this thread to see if their bug is already reported.

Edited November 21, 2012 by wouterbeer

[Guest Colossae3.23]

The issue is completely resolved in r3.

ahh... I must have missed that. I was thinking people may have had the fix already. :P

[Guest Colossae3.23]

Then why is this not added (again) to the second post 'known issues'? Together with other bugs like lagging video playback and (for some) phone signal dropping? This would help get a nice overview of bugs that can be worked on / come with this CM9 release and then people do not have to read all 32 pages of this thread to see if their bug is already reported.

I think the answer to this is, that it is an experimental rom. So, its really in the testing stages and because its in a state of development atm, I reckon uncertainty comes with the territory.

[Guest dan nedan]

Then why is this not added (again) to the second post 'known issues'? Together with other bugs like lagging video playback and (for some) phone signal dropping? This would help get a nice overview of bugs that can be worked on / come with this CM9 release and then people do not have to read all 32 pages of this thread to see if their bug is already reported.

good point

[Guest Colossae3.23]

good point

I know what you're saying, but this is all done as a favour to us.

[Guest Smiff2]

I think the answer to this is, that it is an experimental rom. So, its really in the testing stages and because its in a state of development atm, I reckon uncertainty comes with the territory.

I know what you're saying, but this is all done as a favour to us.

OK, it doesn't matter if it's free, paid, "experimental", or "stable". the dev<>user feedback loop simply runs much smoother, and the software gets better faster, if someone is maintaining (impartial and accurate as possible) Known Issues. not the developer either because his time is better spent developing; someone he nominates to go between users and himself. this is a problem i've noticed again and again on modaco and other sites. the developer's own known issues are a good starting point of course. Free software really has an advantage as it's easier to get interested users to give their time, also for free. I'd volunteer except i already spend too much time here and don't even use this ROM yet (and the G300s i look after aren't mine, making me a poor bug tester).

sorry for going OT i just wonder why this is always the reply when it really doesn't make sense.

TL:DR now Daz has gone public with his ROM that could be the #1 user choice for the G300, he needs to grow the team to avoid being swamped with user feedback.

Edited November 21, 2012 by Smiff2

[Guest tcpaulh]

Yeah if Dev's can't be bothered to keep us updated with current bug tracking info in the first post (and eta's), they shouldn't post in the first place.

[Guest Smiff2]

woah that's not what i meant at all. hope that's sarcasm?

[Guest Colossae3.23]

woah that's not what i meant at all. hope that's sarcasm?

I knew what you meant. Its a good idea. But, I still got to mindful that it is a gift

[Guest tmor]

Sometimes i feel like auto bright is not working properly :/

[Guest intensedarkness]

Sometimes i feel like auto bright is not working properly :/

Sincere thanks for sharing your feelings. Much appreciated.

[Guest kaplanvr]

When installing the Google apps zip I got a message saying it had failed and that the zip was bad. It also appears as a corrupt zip file when trying to open it in windows. Is there another version I should try?

Also I rebooted after installing I've been stuck on the cyanogen 9 splash screen for a few minutes now, is this meant to be happening?

Edited November 21, 2012 by kaplanvr

[Guest kyan31]

When installing the Google apps zip I got a message saying it had failed and that the zip was bad. It also appears as a corrupt zip file when trying to open it in windows. Is there another version I should try?

Just re-download it and it should work.

Edited November 21, 2012 by kyan31

[Guest intensedarkness]

When installing the Google apps zip I got a message saying it had failed and that the zip was bad. It also appears as a corrupt zip file when trying to open it in windows. Is there another version I should try?

Try downloading it again: http://cmw.22aaf3.co...0317-signed.zip

Directly from phone to SD, then try flashing via CWM.

EDIT: Woops someone beat me to it.

Edited November 21, 2012 by intensedarkness

[Guest kyan31]

Daz, for some reason, my phone says that it has no service even though it does. Ever since I flashed CM9, I think its always been like that but I guess I never noticed :P

[Guest kaplanvr]

Try downloading it again: http://cmw.22aaf3.co...0317-signed.zip

Directly from phone to SD, then try flashing via CWM.

EDIT: Woops someone beat me to it.

so before I read your mesasge I tried booting cyanogen without installing google apps and now it's been on the cyanogen splash screen for a few minutes without progressing beyond it, could that be a result of trying to load it without google apps?

[Guest oldfella]

so before I read your mesasge I tried booting cyanogen without installing google apps and now it's been on the cyanogen splash screen for a few minutes without progressing beyond it, could that be a result of trying to load it without google apps?

it should load fine without google apps

download the rom and apps again, check the md5, factory reset and reflash

[Guest Dazzozo]

Daz, for some reason, my phone says that it has no service even though it does. Ever since I flashed CM9, I think its always been like that but I guess I never noticed :P

It's because some plmn/spn stuff hasn't been implemented yet

[Guest djuroue]

Daz, for some reason, my phone says that it has no service even though it does. Ever since I flashed CM9, I think its always been like that but I guess I never noticed :P

Why are you using an antivirus ?! :P