[Kernel] CeXstel v0.62 (Y300/G510) [Stock/CM] [29/03/14]

[Guest Market88]

I Which downclock step seems better for you? I tried 196Mhz and 19mhz. I noticed a better battery life with 196 than 19 mhz, probably because if i set 19 the cpu often jump to 1080 even if i dont touch screen, with 196 the clock is more stable and jump up only when screen is touched PS. I've fusionx 1.0 and the battery life is great with all clock step but i noticed maybe a little improvement with 196 rather than 19

Edited December 20, 2013 by Market88

[Guest chiveta]

will support cm 11 and cm 10.2 in this kernel? ceastel

[Guest ehsan_zt]

I'm using cm 10.1 r19 with CeXstel v0.54 and I was wondering if I'm using zRam or not,is there anyway to check this ? and also I would like to know how much % compression this kernel supports ?( is it the same az cm 10.1 original kernel or not ?)

 

also I checked my swappiness with android tuner SysCtl ,it should be 45 as mentioned in the changelog but it was 20. I tried changing it one time set it to aplly on boot and the other time on init.d but it always changes back to 20.any suggestions on how to set it ??

Edited December 21, 2013 by ehsan_zt

[Guest Gliwusss]

why discontinued?

[Guest SH3H1]

That's so sad :(

Why discontinued?

You were the only kernel dev for Y300,ceastel :wub:

I thought you will back after Christmas...

It's truly very bad news for me :(

[Guest ako0]

its really bad news, the best performance and stability i've seen in y300 was with this kernel on fusionX Rom, any ways thanks for your developing so far

[Guest DamnedMaruko]

Guys i think is now discontinued 'cause Christmas Holiday xD
I swear :\

[Guest Zly Dzik]

Yeah Ceastel said something about v0.54 being last update before Christmas;)

[Guest SH3H1]

Hey someone read the first post ??

Last update coming after Christmas :wub:

And no overclocking :(

[Guest StewieTech]

Oh cmon ceastel, please consider to continue to develop this kernel. It´s a great kernel, the only one around, and a lot of people cherish our little y300 like me, we really want to squeeze this bad boy. I´ve been enjoying flashing your kernel since early versions and i´m always looking up for the next version, i even have this page bookmarked in chrome and everthing. Well, if it´s final decision, at least make the last update the best possible, with, may i suggest, overclock(?). Thanks a lot mate. :)

[Guest H3ROS]

If it's truly being discontinued then I'd suggest uploading the project to github so that another dev could continue with it. That's really the best way to support a device.

[Guest Ceastel]

So... after one week of "DISCONTINUED" I start continue develop this kernel . (But updates will be rarely ...)
Also thanks for all donations and motivate me to continue develop of kernel... :D

Update to v0.55 with a lot of kernel variants.
(too much kernel variants I have headache :P)
Now I need help with testing all variants ...
Write to me if any kernel have wrong name (for example 393MB version have 400MB ...)

@H3ROS
It's hard to upload something like kernel source with very low upload speed...

Edited December 27, 2013 by Ceastel

[Guest takyo]

thank so much Ceastel for the new update..advance happy New Year  :)

[Guest seluce]

The difference between the new 0.55 versions? The free RAM? :o

 

And btw, why cancled the OC? :/

Edited December 27, 2013 by seluce

[Guest Victod]

The difference between the new 0.55 versions? The free RAM? :o

 

And btw, why cancled the OC? :/

Changelog

Spoiler 

 

 

v0.55

-fix problem with video (?)

-four variations of kernel

-deleted ARM RWSEM algorithm

-deleted all process from "do not killable list"

:P

[Guest ovtovaz]

v0.55 (420 ram) on stock
had no problems with it so far (wifi, 3g, gps, proximity sensor, screen, sound, video, calls)

please excuse my limited English

[Guest Silencer96]

Thanks for the awesome kernel, op!

 

Here are some suggestions:

-CM11 support (along w/ ~420mb of RAM). 

-1.2 Ghz overclocking step (even if it is unstable). 

[Guest Vule991]

I'm on fusionx rom. Why only 1008 mhz? I set this to 1209 mhz, after same results, device work on 1 ghz. Annoying.

[Guest Silencer96]

I concur. A 1.2Ghz step would do this kernel justice. 

[Guest SH3H1]

Wow :D

Very glad to see you are back :)

Thanks for the new year present :wub:

Happy new year ;)

[Guest TheKisama]

make it for cm11, pretty please? =)

most users of this forum are probably on cm11.

[Guest fonz93]

@Ceastel, thanks for new version!!! :)  :)  

 

CM10:

 

on 407 and 400 mb version the video problem is partially fixed, HQ works fine, HD 480p not, 393 mb ram version totally fixed  

407 mb HD 480p logcat:http://pastebin.com/R10ByWnt

400 mb HD 480p logcat:http://pastebin.com/feBfHR9V

Edited December 28, 2013 by fonz93

[Guest StewieTech]

Thanks for version 0.55! :D

 

I´m testing 420mb/stock and will report if i notice something wrong.

[Guest noemi.abril]

Thanks for this job... but i can't test it now with CM11/KK4.4.2...

[Guest windowsette96]

If you add CM11 support it would be great.